Archive for the ‘Sustainability’ Category

NJ's Open Space in Jeopardy

Written by Mike Pisauro on October 31st, 2009 in Sustainability | No Comments »

On November 3rd we all get a choice on whether we will preserve NJ or not.  On November 3rd we get to vote in favor of preserving open spaces, farmland and historic sites.  We get to vote yes to ballot question #1.

I have a guest post on the Green Jersey blog on why we all should vote yes.  I have also written about the importance of open space on this blog

You can also read more about NJ’s open space program at the NJ Keep it Green Facebook page.

On November 3rd, please vote for NJ’s open space program.


Upcoming posts on Green building

Written by Mike Pisauro on February 19th, 2009 in Green Building, land use, Sustainability | No Comments »

Last week, I met with Rich Feldmann and Rees Keck of Greenstreet of New Jersey, Inc. Greenstreet is a green builder located in Princeton, NJ. We are going to work together on a few collaborative posts regarding what green building is, what incentives the industry needs from the State and the cost of green building versus standard building. I am looking forward to this collaborative effort and hope it yields some interesting conversations.


Wind and Solar are ahead of coal in more than ways than one.

Written by Mike Pisauro on February 17th, 2009 in Business, Renewable Energy, Solar, Sustainability, Wind | No Comments »

Everyone is talking about renewable energy.  Renewable energy is part of the Obama administration’s plan  and part of the stimulus plan.  Renewable energy is front and center to the State’s energy master plan and its Global Warming Response Act.  Well, wind and solar energy is also a major employer and economic driver.    I saw a couple of days ago over at Renewable + Law that wind and solar employees more people than the coal industry.

That is fairly amazing considering on how little electricity the country generates from renewables compared to the almost 50% from coal.  It does mean that by investing in renewables government will be driving employment.  I hope this also means that are at a tipping point away from fossil fuels and moving towards a more sustainable manner for generating energy.


More promises on NJ's open space

Written by Mike Pisauro on January 18th, 2009 in Clean Air, Clean Water, Global Warming, Highlands, legislation, Politics, Sustainability | 1 Comment »

During this year’s State of the State speech, Governor Corzine stood before both houses of the legislature and spoke about the State’s commitment to open space. He said:

A second topic of vital concern is “open space,” and it’s a tough one. Not because we don’t want it, but because it’s a tough financing issue. Open space preservation has always been one of New Jersey’s priorities and which should be today, and it must be addressed before June 30th. It is my preferred approach that we put in place a long-term funding solution.

That said we need, at a minimum, an interim-bonding question for November’s ballot to extend the financing the voters approved in 2007.

On the face of it this is good news for the State’s open space program as that program is out of money. Unfortunately, this is not the first time that the Governor committed himself to open space preservation. He has on multiple occasions spoke on his and the State’s commitment to preserving open space. He has not followed through with his commitment. In fact he has on occasion worked against open space funding. In 2007 the legislature was moving strongly on passing legislation that would have created, with voter approval, a long term funding solution for open space. The Governor’s office stopped it and gave us a temporary solution instead, P.L. 2007 Ch. 119. When he signed P.L. 2007 Ch. 119, he promised that he would work with the legislature, during the lame duck session, to put in place a permanent solution. There was no leadership from the Governor’s office and his promise that during Nov and December 2007 a solution would be worked out did not occur.

Then on Sept. 5, 2008, Gov. Corzine issued Executive Order 114 regarding the Highlands. That E.O. provides that:

WHEREAS, in enacting the Highlands Act, the Legislature found and declared that, as a matter of wise public policy and fairness to property owners, a strong and significant commitment by the State is necessary to fund the acquisition of exceptional natural resource value lands; and

WHEREAS, it is vital that the Garden State Preservation Trust be reauthorized and that a statewide transfer of development rights program be considered to meet the open space and agricultural preservation needs of the Highlands Region and the State, and, in part, to address landowner equity issues in the Highlands Region.

Since September there has not been any direction from the Governor’s office on open space funding.

At the beginning of December, the Department of Environmental Protection released its draft Global Warming Response Act Recommendation. The Plan calls for funding of GSPT and calls for the legislature to

Reauthorize the Garden State Preservation Trust, and provide for incentives, technical assistance, and project facilitation, to continue and enhance conservation of the State’s natural assets.

I hope that the cumulative weight of all these promises forces the Governor and the Legislature to act and put in place a permanent solution for open space funding. New Jersey needs to actively preserve open space. Preserving open space is vital to the State of New Jersey for multiple reasons.

Over the last several years, NJ has been loosing open space at a rate of 16,600 acres per year. As we continue to lose space we increase sprawl, increase the time it takes for people to travel from home to work and back again. This increases everyone’s commuter costs and increases the amount of air pollution, including greenhouse gases, we emmitt.

As we continue to develop and put impervious cover over our lands, we diminish our ability to recharge our aquifers. New Jersey relies heavily on aquifers for its drinking water, especially in South Jersey. It is also one of the most important tools for preserving the drinking water from the Highlands, which supplies water to over half of new jerseyans.

As we loose more and more open space, one of our tools to address global warming is lost. From a global warming perspective the “estimated 1.5 million acres –one third of New Jersey’s dry land mass” which has been preserved provides for “substantial amount of carbon storage.” Open space, especially forest, act as a carbon sink.

Open space preservation is also important from an economic perspective. The eco-tourism industry in New Jersey provides close to $3.9 billion in economic benefits. Our natural resources also provide about $19 billion in economic benefits. In a time when property values are decreasing, it has been found that properties in close proximately to open space have a higher value than properties further away. Our open space funds also go to preserving farmland. Open space funds can be used to get people out of the flood plains so that we do not have to rebuild homes that have been destroyed by floods on multiple occasions. Open space is a multifunction tool in our economic engine.

In short, the Governor and the Legislature must keep their promises to putting in place a permanent funding solution for open space. It is too important economically and environmentally for us to allow this promise to be broken again. For more information on the campaign for open space, you can visit the Keep It Green Campaign’s website.


Global Warming Action plan has been released.

Written by Mike Pisauro on December 18th, 2008 in Global Warming, Renewable Energy, Sustainability | 1 Comment »

Recently, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection released the State’s draft plan on addressing global warming.  (click here for a copy of the plan).  This plan behind schedule as the Global Warming Response Act required that the plan be presented to the Governor, legislators and the Treasurer no latter than June 30, 2008.  NJSA 26:2C-42(c).  At least part of the delay was the desire to utilize the State’ energy master plan which was released in October.

DEP will be holding several public hearings on portions of the plan in January with the intent of finalizing the plan.  This would also seem to me to indicate that DEP will not make the January 1, 2009 deadline for reporting how the State is doing with emissions, reduction of emissions and progress on the plan.

While I am reviewing the plan, here are a few highlights.  The Plan is broken down into sectors: Land Use, Transportation, Energy Efficiency, Renewable energy and provides many recommendations on how to proceed.  The Plan also points to three things the State has done while it was generating this plan:  The Energy Master Plan, RGGI and the State’s Low Emission Vehicle program.

I do not want to knock the State, but if these are the three major things the State has done to move its battle on global warming, I am somewhat disappointed.  First, we missed the first RGGI auction.  The second auction is scheduled for today and NJ is participating.  Second, the EMP was just finalized and many of its recommendations need legislative action.  Some of this Legislative action has been proposed for many months (if not a couple of years) and is not moving.  Lastly, the State’s adoption of the California low emission vehicle program is on hold and in litigation.  For California’s program to be in effect, EPA had to issue a waiver to California.  Once that waiver was issued the other states could follow.  EPA denied that waiver last year.   This denial has resulted in a lawsuit by California and a call for EPA to reconsider.  With the new administration and our new EPA administrator, Lisa Jackson, hopefully the waiver will be reconsidered and issued.

In short I still have to finish my review but I am glad that there is a plan and the State will be taking public comments on the plan.  I hope to have more information on the plan up shortly.


Hopewell Valley Green Market on Sat 10-18

Written by Mike Pisauro on October 16th, 2008 in Business, Global Warming, Sustainability | No Comments »

This Sat, Oct. 18th from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. the Hopewell Valley Green Market will be having their first event.  The prime mover of the market is Tom Adelman.  The goal of the event is to demonstate to people some of the green options there are available.  Also to educate people and businesses how we all have an effect on the environment and the little and not so little things we can do to minimize that effect.  How we all can take just a little bit out of the major issue of our day: global warming.

This is an amazing demonstration of the old adage of “think global act local”  The market is presenting an opportunity for people to learn of the options that are available to them right in their backyard.  By bringing together merchants to display their “green” products it also provides an opportunity to cut through an amazing amount of green hype and greenwashing.

It is also an amazing demonstration of what a few energetic people can do.  I had been wondering with the faultering economy whether people’s environmental interests would wane and whether there really was a committment by the general population to a healthy environment.  The Hopewell Valley business community has clearly risen to the occassion and have shown their support.

For more information on the event go to their website (here).  I hope to see you there.


I'm missing something with offshore drilling

Written by Mike Pisauro on August 17th, 2008 in Ocean, Sustainability | No Comments »

The hot topic of offshore drilling seems to be an almost daily topic in the news. Two weeks ago, I came across a poll by the Monmouth University/Gannet New Jersey Poll on offshore drilling that got me thinking about this blog. The poll can be found here. A few days later, I read an article by New York Times columnist, Paul Krugman entitled “Can this planet be saved?” And here is what I do not understand…

The current Bush administration, the Republican party and its Presidential hopeful, John McCain, are calling for the lifting of the moratorium on offshore drilling, hailing it as the way to address the country’s energy needs and to reduce gasoline prices. Based upon the Monmouth University Poll it seems like a lot of people agree with them – sort of. According to the poll, 56% of the respondents support drilling for oil off the coast of New Jersey and, while this is not an overwhelming percentage, it is still the majority response. Now, here is where I get confused, while a majority of the respondents seem to support drilling, less than half of them think that it will have any real impact on the price of gasoline. These statistics are right in line with what Krugman wrote. He noted that merely saying that offshore drilling will relieve gas prices seems to be swaying public opinion. McCain is using the argument to brand his critics as the cause of the high gas prices we all feel when we go to fill up the tank.

The reality is that any resulting decrease in the price of gasoline is at least a decade away and even then, for all real purposes, it will be an insignificant decrease. The Energy Information Agency, which is the government agency in charge of monitoring and projecting our energy needs – including gasoline- has said that opening up our outer continental shelf to drilling will have little impact on the price of gasoline. It clearly will have no immediate impact.

Tourism is one of the top industries in New Jersey and it is vital to our economy. In 2007, the Tourism industry brought in almost 38 billion dollars – and a large part of that revenue came from the visitors to the shore region. Forgetting for a minute any environmental impact of off shore drilling, why should we risk damaging a very real and profitable economic sector when the potential rewards are almost negligible? The recent spill on the Mississippi River caused huge economic damage as over 200 ships were delayed in reaching their destination until the oil could be cleaned from the river. The Mississippi incident spilled 419,000 gallons of oil. The infamous Exxon Valdez spilled 10.8 million gallons of oil into the ocean and affected 11,000 square miles of ocean and adjacent shore. Even though the Valdez spill was 19 years ago the environmental effects are still being felt.

Can you imagine what an oil slick at the mouth of the Delaware or along our coast would do to the ports in N.J. and Philly? What would happen to all of the hotels, restaurants, and other businesses along our coast that rely on tourists’ dollars?

Here is another point of confusion. Oil companies are posting record profits and a large percentage of existing on and offshore leases held by those oil companies are not even being used. The reduction in gas prices resulting from new off shore drilling will not be felt for a decade or more and will, in fact, only amount to a penny or two. A spill, however, could potentially devastate one of the most important economic generators in the state. But we must open up even more areas for drilling and cannot force companies that already have leases but are not using them to put them into production.

Given all of this, why are so many people are falling for the rhetoric? And how do we turn the tide?


Green Business in our Backyards

Written by Mike Pisauro on July 7th, 2008 in Business, Recycling, Sustainability | No Comments »

Over the last year or so going Green has become very trendy and markety. The general public is beginning to demand that their products not only work effectively but the products do not harm the environment in their use or manufacture. Some businesses are greener than others. Some businesses merely claim to be green while in reality they are not. These businesses are engaged in greenwashing.

For a business that is truly green and engaged in sustainability we only have to look to the State’s capital and TerraCycle. TerraCycle’s original product is to take garbage, allow nature to take its course, then use the resulting “worm poop” (their words not mine) and sell it as liquid plant food. TerraCycle then takes the idea of reuse and recycle by packaging their worm poop in used soda bottles.

TerraCycle has started a new program in conjunction with Kraft Foods. TerraCycle has begun collecting the wrappers from juice pouches, yorgurt containers, cliff energy bar wrappers, oreo cooking wrappers, etc. TerrayCycle will donate 2 cents for each wrapper and the program is funded by Kraft. TerraCycle then takes the wrappers and pouches and turns them into school folders, lunch boxes and backpacks.

TerraCycle is a great example of a company that is helping reduce our impact on the environment. Not only are they taking garbage out of the waste stream therefore reducing what is going into our landfills, the company is then reusing these products. For more information on TerraCycle go to their website.